Teaching with “For Love and Money,” part 2

Posted in Romance Literature on January 28th, 2012 by Admin
I just sent my students in ENG 383 (Women and Literature: Popular Romance Fiction) a list of paper topics, and as you’ll see in this post and the ones that follow, these topics draw on our initial experiences with Laura’s For Love and Money. The papers will be 6-8 pages long–and once I have them in hand, I’ll have more ideas about how the students have responded so far to the secondary text. My sense so far, based on class discussion, is that For Love and Money not only introduces students to some very useful ideas about the genre, but also models the application of those ideas in the form of good, thoughtful close readings. So far, in short, so good!

The first chapter in For Love and Money treats the five “modes” of literature identified back in the 1950s by Northrop Frye, discussing each of them (myth, ‘romance,’ high mimetic, low mimetic, and irony) with examples of how they show up in and shape one or more HMB romance novels. Since 2006 I’ve opened almost every one of my romance classes with a discussion of these modes, since they give me the opportunity to nudge students away from thinking of low-mimetic literary realism as the “norm” against which to measure other forms of fiction, usually in order to find them wanting in some way. For Love and Money makes teaching these modes and their relationships to one another very, very easy, and it primes students to look for them in the texts they go on to read.

The book then proceeds to discuss how and why romance novels also use “modal counterpoint,” the interplay of contrasting modes in a single novel. This, too, is a topic that I’ve tried to approach in other classes, with mixed success, mostly when I teach Suzanne Brockmann’s novel Unsung Hero. For Love and Money makes the concept very clear, and since modal counterpoint is quite vividly on display throughout The Duke is Mine, this was a godsend. Rather than balk at or get bewildered by the contrasting tones in the novel, students approached them as a deliberate aesthetic feature of the text–which meant that, in discussion, they could discuss the relationship between this feature (multiple modes in one text) and other multiplicities and doublings in the novel.

Here’s the paper topic, then, which I hope will provoke some interesting close reading from the students:

1. The first chapter in Laura Vivanco’s For Love and Money sets out the five “modes” of literature identified by Northrop Frye and shows how attending to the “modal counterpoint” in a romance novel can make sense of its shifting tones, metaphors, and rhetoric. These modes (and modal counterpoint) can be understood from a purely aesthetic standpoint, in terms of the structure and individual character of any given novel, but they may also be looked at from other perspectives: for example, Vivanco argues that the use of hyperbolic metaphors and allusions to “romantic” and high mimetic mythoi might aim to capture something of the experience of “romantic illusion,” which demonstrably forms a part of falling in love, at least for some (see pp. 65-69).
Write an essay on the use of modal counterpoint in The Duke is Mine, using ideas from Vivanco, from class discussion, and from your own insight to understand how James deploys a variety of modes in the novel, playing them off against one another. Your essay can be comprehensive, drawing on scenes and passages from various parts of the novel to illustrate James’s use of various modes, or it can focus on the counterpoint between various modes in a single scene, attending closing to a single chapter or passage. In either case, please keep in mind the guiding principle of our class: you want to make the novel seem as interesting as possible, whether by showing that it is more complexly coherent and artfully constructed than it might seem at first glance or by showing that it is more interestingly self-divided, conflicted, and ambivalent.
We also spent some time on Chapter 2, which focuses on what Frye called mythoi. More on that chapter, and the paper topic that came out of it, in my next post!

Teach Me Tonight

Tags: , , ,

Teaching with “For Love and Money”

Posted in Romance Literature on January 27th, 2012 by Admin



–by Eric Selinger
Six years ago I taught DePaul University’s first course exclusively devoted to popular romance fiction: a gen-ed (or “Liberal Studies”) course that ran from E.M. Hull’s The Sheik (1919) to Bet Me, by Jennifer Crusie (2004). I have since taught about twenty-five courses on the genre, from large undergraduate surveys to senior and graduate seminars. The novels I’ve taught range from Christian inspirational romance to BDSM and LGBT romances, often accompanied by some range of essays and chapters from popular romance scholarship.
This winter, I’m teaching two romance classes, both of which I’m going to start blogging about here at Teach Me Tonight. One of them is built around fresh scholarly resource: Laura’s brand new book, For Love and Money: the Literary Art of the Harlequin Mills & Boon Romance. I suspect I’m the first person to teach with this book, and I want to give anyone out there who might be considering it, either for class or for pleasure reading, a sense of how it’s working in this context.
Let’s start with logistics. When I asked my university bookstore to order hard copies of the book from Lulu, they balked, unused to dealing with an e-published / POD volume. (Our bookstore is a Barnes & Noble, and the fact that For Love and Money was available as a Kindle book, but not a Nook book, may have factored in their decision.) I promptly emailed the students directly, giving them links to download the book or purchase the paperback, and they were utterly unfazed by the prospect. About 2/3, I’d say, bought the paperback; the rest seem to be reading it on netbooks, e-readers, or tablets in class.
Because I wasn’t sure whether they’d all have the book by the first full day of class, however–a worry I won’t have in the future–I assigned some other reading before it. This is an upper-division undergraduate course, and I wanted to get students up to speed on the history of popular romance scholarship, the various debates that have structured it since the 1970s, and so forth. We started with three things:
  • The chapter on “Reading Romantic Fiction” from Joanne Hollows’ book Feminism, Femininity and Popular Culture (2000), which gives an introductory overview of critical debates from the 70s-90s, grounding them in critiques of mass culture that date back to the 19th century;
  • The introduction to New Approaches to Popular Romance Fiction, which covers the same period from a slightly different angle, and which brings things forward to the present, more or less; and
  • My own essay in New Approaches, “How to Read a Romance Novel (and Fall in Love with Popular Romance),” which talks about why it’s been so hard for critics to invest in giving “close readings” of romance fiction–and then offers an example of what such reading might look like, working with Laura Kinsale’s Flowers from the Storm.

Not much discussion that day, I’m sorry to say–I think I over-prepped, as I sometimes do when nervous. Instead, I talked my class through the critical history outlined in these three readings, so that they’d have a sense of the charges against and defenses of popular romance fiction in the contexts of 1) critiques of mass culture more generally (many of which are highly gendered, as Hollows shows); 2) feminist debates about the genre, including over whether it should be thought about as “pornography for women”; 3) the response of romance authors to these debates, primarily as gathered in the Dangerous Men, Adventurous Women anthology; and 4) the “new wave” of romance criticism that begins somewhere in the late 1990s, and picks up in the early 2000s, and includes Laura’s book.

For the second day of class, I’d assigned the Introduction and first chapter (“Mimetic Modes”) of Laura’s book. Our conversation began, though, with an extended discussion of her dedication: “To every Harlequin Mills & Boon author who has ever been asked, ‘When are you going to write a real novel?’” I had students brainstorm lists of the characteristics of the “real novel” and the “Harlequin Mills & Boon novel,” drawing on the previous day’s reading and on their own gut sense, as English majors, of what these differences might be.
This turned out to be a fabulous way to organize our thoughts, both in terms of the texts themselves and in terms of the ways they’re written, published, marketed, and consumed, per student assumptions and as these get discussed in classes at our university. I kicked myself that I hadn’t asked these students to read anything from Mark McGurl’s The Novel Art: Elevations of American Fiction After Henry James, which has a wonderful discussion of how the high-art novel emerges (quite anxiously) from the sea of popular fiction during the later 19th century, but their exposure to a bit of that history via the Hollows chapter proved helpful in clarifying just how deeply they’ve been indoctrinated in some old, quite sketchy ideas about the distinction between “real” art (which is deliberate, and evidently created in pursuit of craft, social commentary, or inward spiritual necessity) as opposed to popular culture (filthy lucre!).
The key terms in Laura’s title and subtitle, Love and Money and Literary Art, provided us with a useful frame of reference here, as did her introductory discussion of popular romance being “literature’s Other” (thus Curthoys and Docker, qtd. 12) or being seen as the “degenerate” form of an older, more artistic genre. (This as opposed to the evolutionary metaphors commonly used for detective and science fiction, which is said to start as pulp fiction and then rise to the status of literature, at least in the hands of this or that author.) We talked about the denigration of HMB and of popular romance more generally—what had they seen, heard, etc. here at DePaul–and ended with Laura’s comparison between HMB fiction and 15th century cancionero love poetry, which really struck a chord with several students.

By the end of class, they were ready to talk about reading romance novels as “real novels,” which laid the foundation for our next go-round. I’ll blog about that later this week, and then, at the end of the week, about our first attempts to read a particular romance novel, The Duke is Mine by Eloisa James, with Laura’s study in mind. I chose the novel because it so prominently features a “mythos,” in Northrop Frye’s terms–in this case, the story of the Princess and the Pea–and Laura’s second chapter is all about the ways that HMB romances deploy and revise and comment on recurring stories, or “mythoi.” As it turns out, however, the first chapter of For Love and Money, about various fictional “modes” and the aesthetics of “modal counterpoint,” also turned out to be quite helpful. Stay tuned!

Teach Me Tonight

Tags: , ,

Giveaway of For Love and Money

Posted in Romance Literature on December 28th, 2011 by Admin
Laura Vivanco

Joanna Chambers, who very kindly read draft versions of parts of For Love and Money, has extremely generously decided to promote the book too. She’s holding a competition on her blog this week and the prize is an e-copy of the book: “To enter, just post the name of your favourite category romance of all time – it doesn’t have to be a HQ/M&B (for all you Loveswept readers out there…).” [Edited to add: the contest has now closed.]

The good news for those of you who prefer paper books is that the price at Lulu has just decreased to £14.95.

As for me, I’ve been avoiding giving book recommendations at the Spurtle, talking about metafiction and the “rules” of romance at Liz Fielding’s blog and had my writing praised by my editor.

And if you’re bored of reading about my book, you might be interested in Joanna’s post about female impersonators and cross-dressing heroines.

Teach Me Tonight

Tags: , ,

My New Book – For Love and Money: The Literary Art of the Harlequin Mills & Boon Romance

Posted in Romance Literature on December 16th, 2011 by Admin
Laura Vivanco

I’m very, very pleased to be able to announce that my new book, For Love and Money: The Literary Art of the Harlequin Mills & Boon Romance is now available.

Since this isn’t a time for modesty, I’ll share my back-cover quotes:

“Laura Vivanco’s For Love and Money is an impressive study of the popular fiction of Harlequin Mills and Boon that is a must read for any student of popular fiction and for those who write and love the genre” – Liz Fielding, author of over 50 Harlequin Mills & Boon romances.

“Deep learning, wide reading, and clear thinking are very much in evidence in Vivanco’s exploration of HM&B. A welcome addition to popular romance criticism.” – Professor Pamela Regis, author of A Natural History of the Romance Novel.

“Laura Vivanco’s For Love and Money is the book that scholars and fans have both been waiting for: a deft, attentive introduction to the Harlequin Mills & Boon romance novel as a work of art. [...] Vivanco traces the connections between these books and the classical myths and medieval romances they so often deliberately echo, and she shows how the novels use allusion and metatextual reflection to defend their genre. (“Scorn not the sonnet,” Wordsworth warned in a sonnet—Harlequin Mills & Boon novels have long taught readers to “scorn not the romance.”) Vivanco’s conversation with earlier critics, from the 1930s “Battle of the Brows” through 21st century scholars like Pamela Regis, is lively, engaging, and good-humored, and she has a remarkable eye for the textual details that bring each novel to life. I am profoundly impressed.” – Professor Eric M. Selinger, author of What Is It Then Between Us? Traditions of Love in American Poetry.

My publisher, Humanities Ebooks, is (as their name suggests), an academic e-press, and the book is available from their site as a pdf. This is a format that deals particularly well with footnotes. A Kindle edition is also available at Amazon .at .com .de .es .fr .it and .uk .

HEB has teamed up with Lulu so that paper copies can be printed on demand. Lulu’s preview of the table of contents and the introduction is embedded below.

A brief summary of each of the chapters and a list of the HM&B romances cited, can be found at my website.

Teach Me Tonight

Tags: , , , , , , ,

IASPR 2011: Sex, Money, Power, and Romance

Posted in Romance Literature on February 16th, 2011 by Admin
Laura Vivanco

This year’s IASPR conference takes as its theme “Can’t Buy Me Love?
Sex, Money, Power, and Romance.” The schedule has now been finalised and the papers being given are as follows:

Catherine Roach (University of Alabama, USA): “I Love You,” He Said: The Money Shot in Romance Fiction as Feminist Porn

Ashley Greenwood (San Diego State University, USA): Nora Roberts and Archetypes

Jonathan A. Allan (University of Toronto, Canada): Fetish Commodity of Virginity in Popular Romance Novels

An Goris (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium): Rape as a Trope in the Work of Nora Roberts

Sarah S. G. Frantz (Fayetteville State University, USA): The Rapist Hero and the Female Imagination

Linda Lee (University of Pennsylvania, USA): The Illusion of Choice: Problematizing Predestined Love in Paranormal Romance

Jessica Miller (University of Maine, USA): Emotional Justice in the Novels of Jennifer Crusie

Margaret Toscano (University of Utah, USA): Love’s Balance Sheet: Accounting for the Bondage of Desire and the Freedom of Choice in Historical Romance

Hannah Priest (University of Manchester, UK): ‘Hit Cost a Thousand Pound and Mar’: Love, Sex and Wealth in the Fourteenth-Century Sir Gawain and the Carl of Carlisle

Amanda Allen (Eastern Michigan University, USA): Charm the Boys, Win the Girls: Power Struggles in Mary Stolz’s Cold War Adolescent Girl Romance Novels

Su-hsen Liu (National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan): Modern Gothic Romance and its Translation in Taiwan: A Case Study of the Chinese Translation of Mistress of Mellyn

Pamela Regis (McDaniel College, USA): The First Silhouette: Following the Money

Eric Selinger (DePaul University, USA): Owning the Romance: Crusie, Phillips, and the “Erotics of Property”

Ann Herendeen (Romance Author, USA): The Upper-Class Bisexual Man as Romantic Hero: The “Top” in the Social Structure and in the Bedroom

Angela Toscano (University of Utah, USA): The Limits of Virtue, the Limits of Merit: Power, Privilege & Property in Historical Romance Fiction

Jennifer Kloester (University of Melbourne, Australia): Creating a Genre: The Power of Georgette Heyer’s Regency Novels

Susan M. Kroeg (Eastern Kentucky University, USA): Regency World-Building, History, and the End(s) of Romance

Betty Kaklamanidou (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece): The Absence of Sex and Money in the Contemporary Rom Com. Fact or Fiction?

Jayashree Kamble (University of Minnesota): Temptation and the Big Apple: Bollywood romance goes West in Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna

Federica Balducci (Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand): Love on a Shoestring: Romance, Recession and Consumer Culture in Italian Chick Lit

Elena Oliete Aldea
(University of Zaragoza, Spain): Greed is Good, but Love is Better: the Influence of Economy on Romance in Oliver Stone’s Wall Street Films

Beatriz Oria (University of Zaragoza, Spain): Diamonds Are a Girl’s Best Friend: The Representation of Romantic Love In Sex and the City

Antonia Losano (Middlebury College, USA): Value for Virtue in Multiple-Romance Narrative Romance

Katherine E. Lynch (SUNY Rockland): One Small Step for Romance: The Evolution of the Queer Female Hero

Ruth Sternglantz (Editor, Bold Strokes Books): Where the Wild Things Are: Contemporary Lesbian Romance and the Undomesticated Queer Hero

Lynda Sandoval (Author): The Queer Heroine as a Re-imagined Reflection

Len Barot/Radclyffe (Romance Author, Editor, and Publisher, Bold Strokes Books): Queering the Alpha

There will also be a keynote speech by Laura Kipnis (Northwestern University) and discussions of “Boundaries and Intersections: Romance, Erotica, and Pornography” and “Popular Romance Collection Development in University Libraries.”

Teach Me Tonight

Tags: , , , ,